SoloCodigo

Muchos aquí lo leerán sin problemas . Igual, podemos ir por párrafos y lo terminamos pronto.

With the ease of installation, maintenance, and use of many recent Linux distributions, such as Ubuntu and Fedora, some are left wondering why Linux still isn't more widespread. Here's my theory.

Con la facilidad de instalación, mantenimiento y uso de varias distribuciones recientes de Linux, como Ubuntu y Fedora, algunos todavía se preguntan porqué Linux no es más ampliamente utilizado. Esta es mi teoría.

First, the home computer. People at home generally want to use an OS compatible with what they use at work. Linux isn't at work, so it isn't at home. Additionally, you can't easily play many commercial games on Linux. An overwhelming majority of retail PC games are released for Windows only. Those PC games that are also released for other operating systems are usually released for Windows and MacIntosh. It's rare that a retail PC game is released for Linux.

Primero, la computadora en el hogar. En sus casas, la gente generalmente prefiere utilizar un SO compatible con lo que hacen en su trabajo. Linux no está presente en el trabajo, por tanto tampoco en casa. Además, muchos juegos comerciales no son fácilmente jugables en Linux. La inmensa mayoría de juegos para PC son liberados solo para Windows. Aquellos juegos que también son liberados para otros sistemas normalmente son liberados para Windows y Macintosh. Es poco común que un juego comercial sea liberado para Linux.

But the primary reason that more home users aren't on Linux is because they don't use Linux at work. So the work environment is the root of the problem. As a network administrator, there's one and only one reason that I've never experimented with Linux on the desktop: Microsoft Exchange. The suits love Exchange. They don't love open source groupware that imitates Exchange. And since the suits sign my paycheck, I use it. In fact, at my current place of employment, Exchange is forced on us by the parent organization. So I don't even have the choice of changing.

Pero la razón principal por la que la mayoría de usuarios no usan Linux en su hogar es porque no lo usan en el trabajo. Por lo que la raíz del problema es el ambiente en el trabajo. Como administrador de redes, hay una y solo una razón por la que nunca he experimentado con Linux en mi PC de escritorio: Microsoft Exchange.

(Hasta aquí llegué ).

Now, I know what you're thinking -- Evolution works with Exchange. Well, no, it doesn't. Evolution connects to Exchange via Exchange's Outlook Web Access functionality. The result is this:

    * Evolution is significantly slower than Outlook.
    * Evolution can't engage in calendar sharing or look at public folders in an easy-for-the-lay-person or intuitive manner.
    * Evolution is necessarily limited in functionality in all the same ways that Outlook Web Access is limited in functionality. This is doubly crippling since certain Outlook Web Access features are available only to Internet Explorer clients.


And of course, Wine consistently fails to provide the ability to run Outlook (the single most important program that should work on Wine). Yes, Outlook 97 works. Nobody wants to run Outlook 97, OK? It's nearly a decade old, for crying out loud.

So, in my opinion, Linux will never be mainstream until Evolution or some other email client offers full-fledged Exchange compatibility via a real MAPI connection (not OWA) with all the same features and functionality of the current (or next-closest-to-current) version of Outlook.

It baffles me as to why more attention isn't paid to this issue. Full Exchange compatibility from the Linux desktop would go a long way toward more organizations -- and therefore home users -- adopting Linux. And to those conspiracy theorists who say that home users don't use Linux because Microsoft strongarms OEMs and retailers into selling only Windows computers, I say this: OEMs and retailers sell Windows PCs because most consumers would not buy a Linux computer, for the reasons I've already stated.

yo lei ese mismo articulo hace como 7 años, creo que el autor de este se lo robo a otro, por que en este momento hubiera dicho que los juegos pueden ser utilizados con winex y wine con cierta dificultad corre ya office 2000, no esta atascado en el 97, posiblemente pronto correra el 2003 ya que son mas o menos la misma tecnologia.

asi que hace como 7 años lei que linux seria usado hasta que existiera un cliente de correo electronico tipo outlook, lo cual suena muy bien, no necesariamente es totalmente cierto, pero si algo de peso es el outlook, para el hogar siento que el mayor peso son los juegos, fuera del trabajo la gran mayoria tiene hotmail y eso se consulta hasta con firefox